Asked by: Tim M.

where E is the energy of the object in question, m

where v is the object's velocity. At very small velocities, gamma is approximately equal to one. At velocities near the speed of light, gamma becomes larger and larger (try plugging in some numbers and see). Already you can see why a massive particle can never travel at the speed of light: it would take an infinite amount of energy, and no engine in the universe can provide that sort of power!

Now I will answer your question. Einstein interpreted the combination gamma * m

Mass, like gamma, grows with velocity. As the object approaches the speed of light, the mass approaches infinity!

I should give a word of caution: many physicists simply call m

This relationship can probably be found in most introductory college physics texts. A good book for more details, at a slightly more technical level, is Ray D'Inverno's book Introducing Einstein's Relativity.

It is interesting to look at the behavior of gamma for small velocities. This can be done using a technique from calculus called Taylor expansion. Consult any calculus text if you want to see exactly what it is and how it's done. If we Taylor expand gamma around v = 0, we get

For small velocities, the terms of order 4 and greater are extremely tiny compared to the 2nd order term, so we can neglect those all together. Plugging this expression back into Einstein's equation gives

The first term is just the rest mass of the object. The second term you may recognize to be the kinetic energy of classical Newtonian physics. Thus Einstein's equation reduces to Newton's equations at small velocities. It took so long to discover that Newton's laws weren't quite correct because the velocities we encounter every day are so much smaller than the speed of light. Thanks to Einstein, we can now study physics at any speed!

Answered by: Jason Detwiler, B.S., Physics Grad Student, Stanford University, CA

'For the sake of persons of ... different types, scientific truth should be presented in different forms, and should be regarded as equally scientific, whether it appears in the robust form and the vivid coloring of a physical illustration, or in the tenuity and paleness of a symbolic expression.'**James Clerk Maxwell**

(*1831-1879*)

All rights reserved. © Copyright '1995-'2017 PhysLink.com