Posted on: Apr 29, 2010
We’re constantly being peppered by showers of debris from cosmic rays colliding with atoms in the atmosphere. Cosmic rays aren’t actually rays, of course, they’re particles; ninety percent are protons, the nuclei of hydrogen atoms, and most of the rest are heavier nuclei like iron. Some originate from our own sun but most come from farther off, from the Milky Way or beyond.
“The most energetic cosmic rays are the rarest, and they pose the biggest mystery,” says Spencer Klein of Berkeley Lab’s Nuclear Science Division. He compares the energy of an ultra-high-energy (UHE) cosmic ray to a well-hit tennis ball or a boxer’s punch – all packed into a single atomic nucleus.
“If they’re protons, they have about 40 million times the energy of the protons accelerated at the Large Hadron Collider,” Klein says. “With present technology we’d need to build an accelerator around the sun to produce protons that energetic. Not only do we not know how these cosmic accelerators work, we don’t even know where they are.”
Being electrically charged, even the most energetic cosmic rays are forced to bend when they traverse interstellar magnetic fields, so it’s not possible to extrapolate where they came from by looking back along their paths when they arrive on Earth.
Yet they can’t come from too far away. Klein explains that because cosmic rays lose energy by plowing into the photons of the cosmic microwave background as they travel, “the ones that we observe must come from the ‘local’ universe, within about 225 million light years of Earth. This sounds like a long distance, but, on cosmic scales, it isn’t very far.”
In all that volume of “nearby” space, sources capable of producing such high-energy nuclei have not been clearly identified. One clue to the origin of the highest-energy cosmic rays is the neutrinos they produce when they interact with the very cosmic microwave photons that slow them down.
How to find a cosmic accelerator
“Neutrinos have important advantages as observational tools,” says Klein. “The only way they interact is through the weak interaction, so they aren’t deflected by magnetic fields in flight, and they easily slip through dense matter like stars that would stop the cosmic rays themselves.”
The flip side is that it’s quite a trick to catch neutrinos, especially those produced by rare events. Locating neutrinos produced by UHE cosmic rays needs a detector covering a huge area.
Which is how Klein came to find himself tent-camping on the Ross Ice Shelf last December (the middle of summer in Antarctica), along with his colleague Thorsten Stezelberger of the Lab’s Engineering Division and camp manager Martha Story from the Berg Field Center, a support service at McMurdo Station, the main U.S. base in Antarctica. Klein and Stezelberger were setting up a prototype station for the proposed ARIANNA array of neutrino detectors (ARIANNA stands for the Antarctic Ross Ice Shelf Antenna Neutrino Array).
Unlike such neutrino detectors as SNO in Canada, Daya Bay in China, Super-Kamiokande in Japan, or IceCube, the huge neutrino telescope under construction deep in the ice at the South Pole, ARIANNA doesn’t need miles of rock or the Earth itself to filter out background events. That’s because ARIANNA will be looking for an unusual kind of neutrino signal known as the Askaryan effect.
ARIANNA will observe the shower of electrons, positrons, and other particles produced when a neutrino interacts in the ice below the ARIANNA detectors. In 1962, Gurgen Askaryan, an Armenian physicist, pointed out that these showers contain more electrons than positrons, so have a net electric charge. When a shower develops in ice, this moving charge is an electrical current which produces a powerful pulse of radio waves, emitted in a cone around the neutrino direction.
The energy shed by particles moving faster than the speed of light in a medium like glass or water (light moves through water at only three-quarters of its speed in vacuum) is called Cherenkov radiation, and is perhaps most familiar as the blue glow made by fast-moving electrons in a pool surrounding a nuclear reactor. The same visible-light-wavelength Cherenkov radiation is used to detect charged-particle events created by neutrinos in detectors like IceCube.
Instead of optical wavelengths, ARIANNA observes Cherenkov radiation at radio wavelengths; the strength of the radio signal is proportional to the square of the energy of the neutrino that gave rise to it. To capture these signals, ARIANNA will use radio antennas buried in the snow on top of the ice.
The Ross Ice Shelf makes an ideal component of the ARIANNA detector – not least because the interface where the ice, hundreds of meters thick, meets the liquid water below is an excellent mirror for reflecting radio waves. Signals from neutrino events overhead can be detected by looking for radio waves that have been reflected from this mirror. For neutrinos arriving horizontally, some of the radio waves will be directly detected, and some will be detected after being reflected.
As envisaged by its principal investigator, Steven Barwick of UC Irvine – who visited the Ross Ice Shelf in 2008 – ARIANNA would eventually be comprised of up to 10,000 stations covering a square expanse of ice 30 kilometers on a side.
Neutrinos on ice
Ten thousand stations is the eventual goal, but the first step is to see whether just one station can work. During the Antarctic summer, solar panels will provide power for the radio antennas under the snow and the internet tower that sends data back to McMurdo Station, via a repeater tower on nearby Mt. Discovery. During the long, dark winter, it’s hoped that the power will come from wind turbines or a generator.
When the temperature is mostly below freezing even summer camping is a challenge, as Klein and Stezelberger found. With all supplies brought in by helicopter, the team set up three tents for sleeping, a larger (10 foot by 20 foot) tent as a kitchen, dining room, laboratory and office, and a small tent for a toilet. Instead of tent pegs, the tents are held down by guy ropes tied to “deadman anchors.”
“For each rope, we dug a two-foot-deep hole and buried a long bamboo stake with the rope tied to it,” Stezelberger explains. “When it was taut, we refilled the hole with snow – a fair bit of work.”
On the second day the team unpacked and assembled the six-foot tall station tower, made of metal pipes anchored to plywood feet under the snow. The tower holds four solar panels, a wind turbine, and antennas for receiving time signals from global positioning satellites, and for communicating via Iridium communications satellites.
Klein, Stezelberger and Story spent the third day assembling, testing, and burying the neutrino-detecting antennas in six-foot-deep trenches in the snow. On the fourth day an internet tower – network communications were invaluable for sending data north, and for allowing people to work remotely on the station computer – was brought in by helicopter and erected by a four-person crew, who stayed for lunch. “Fortunately they brought their own,” Klein remarks. “We were wondering how we’d feed everyone with only four forks, four spoons, and four knives.”
After another week, which was mostly spent testing instruments, including bouncing radio signals off the water-ice interface, plus two days waiting for the weather to clear so that helicopters could pick them up, the team finally struck camp. After packaging their gear in slings to be picked up by subsequent flights, they climbed aboard a chopper and returned to base, leaving behind a functioning station intended to survive the oncoming winter.
Klein and Stezelberger made it back to Berkeley Lab by the last day of December. Klein, aided by UC Irvine’s Barwick and graduate student Jordan Hanson, neutrino physicist Ryan Nichol of University College London, and Lisa Gerhardt of Berkeley Lab’s Nuclear Science Division (herself recently returned from work on IceCube at the South Pole), spent the next weeks analyzing the data from the ARIANNA prototype station on the ice, as it continued to report via the internet. The stream of information included housekeeping data and scientific data in the form of antenna signals.
“Wind had generally been so calm during the week and a half we spent on the ice, we were afraid the wind generator wasn’t going to be sufficient for the station’s power needs during the winter,” Klein says. “But after we left, the wind picked up and the wind turbine started functioning, which encouraged us.”
The antenna data was also instructive, and there was a lot of it – signals from natural background noise and from man-made sources. An event every 60 seconds was the “heartbeat” pulse emitted by the station itself, which the team had set up to check the detector.
“But there were other, unexpected periodic signals, pairs separated by almost exactly six seconds, their rate varying over 24 hours,” Gerhardt says. Periodic signals strongly hint at man-made sources. “We think they’re probably from the switching of the power supplies for the internet hardware.”
Other events, aperiodic, were part of the irreducible background, including thermal noise due to molecular motion in the equipment. This set a natural limit to the detector’s performance but should be improved with better equipment.
One thing the prototype station hasn’t seen is an energetic neutrino, and Klein doesn’t expect it to catch one. If the prototype survives the winter, the next step will be a group of five to seven such stations with equipment custom-designed to do the job. The full array is far in the future.
“One real event would be an accomplishment,” says Klein, “and it might take a hundred stations to achieve even that. UHE cosmic rays are extremely rare. If we can track just one back to its origin, we’ll have made a tremendous advance in neutrino astronomy.”
This article draws on Spencer Klein’s account of his trip to the Ross Ice Shelf in December, 2009 in his blog, “Neutrino Hunting in Antarctica.”
For more about ultra-high-energy neutrino detection, read “ARIANNA: A New Concept for UHE Neutrino Detection,” by Steven W. Barwick,
For more about the hunt for high-energy neutrinos, read “High Energy Neutrinos from the Cosmos,” by Per Olof Hulth.
Our server costs have gone up and our advertising revenue has gone down. You do the math! If you find our site useful, consider donating to keep us going. Thanks!
'There is no inductive method which could lead to the fundamental concepts of physics. Failure to understand this fact constituted the basic philosophical error of so many investigators of the nineteenth century.'