Is weight determined strictly by the distance between and mass of two objects, or are other factors figured in; i.e. can a person be considered weightless underwater?

Asked by: Chris Smallwood


Your question is as much about symantics as physics, so I'm afraid the answer depends on your definition of the term 'weight'.

If weight is defined as the gravitational force on a body, then your statement that it depends only on the masses of the two objects and the distance between them (actually, the distance between their respective centers of gravity), is correct. But that definition implies that conditions we ordinarily call 'weightless' are not. Everything from orbiting astronauts to people in falling elevators have a gravitational force acting upon them. This definition implies they all have weight in spite of the fact we ordinarily consider them 'weightless'.

If you use a more specific definition of weight as 'the amount of external force required to keep a body at rest in its inertial frame of reference', you come closer to the more common understanding of 'weightlessness'. In this case an astronaut needs no further 'upward' force to remain stationary in his spacecraft and can be considered 'weightless'. Similarly, an object submerged under water would only weigh the difference between its gravitational force and the upward buoyant force.

Using this second definition, a person underwater wearing just enough weights to establish neutral buoyancy CAN be considered weightless since no additional external force is required to keep him at rest relative to the bottom. Of course, his internal organs still experience a net downward force and require support from within, so the feeling does not exactly duplicate the weightlessness of an orbiting astronaut.

Answered by: Paul Walorski, B.A. Physics, Part-time Physics Instructor



Science Quote

'The strength and weakness of physicists is that we believe in what we can measure. And if we can't measure it, then we say it probably doesn't exist. And that closes us off to an enormous amount of phenomena that we may not be able to measure because they only happened once. For example, the Big Bang. ... That's one reason why they scoffed at higher dimensions for so many years. Now we realize that there's no alternative... '

Michio Kaku
Science Sidebar | Science Education Articles
Cool Summer Science Projects

Why not make science a part of your family’s summer? Perhaps you can set aside one day a week for outdoor projects—maybe Mad Scientist Monday or Scientific Saturday? Here are a few ideas to help get you started. Continue reading ...

10 Ways to Keep Your Kids Interested In Science

Young children are natural scientists: they ask questions, pick up sticks and bugs outside, and are curious about the world around them. But as they get a bit older, many kids gradually lose their interest in science. They might see it as just another task at school, something that doesn't apply to their lives. Of course nothing could be further from the truth, so here are ten ways you can remind your kids that science is everywhere. Most of these are fun for adults, too! Continue reading ...

Top Selling

Here are our physics & astronomy bestsellers:
Magnetic Levitator - Classic
3D Magnetic Field Tube
KonusScience 5 Way Microscope Kit
Revolving Multi-Color Fiberoptic Light
Tin Can Robot 4M Kit
Potato Clock 4M Kit
Mini Plasma Ball
Clean Water Science 4M Kit
Solar Radiometer


USC University of Southern California Dornsife College Physics and Astronomy Department McMaster University Physics and Astronomy Department