A second of time is defined as x oscillations of a cesium atom's resonant frequency, and is commonly measured in atomic clocks. If an atomic clock is propelled at near the speed of light (or at any speed), wouldn't that definition of a second be distorted? If so, shouldn't we add a longitude and latitude to the definition since all places on earth travel at different speeds?
Asked by: Ryan Gallagher


A second of time can only be defined relative to the observer. Whether you determine the passage of one second of time with a stopwatch or a Cesium 133 atom, you want the source of that measurement to be in your own inertial frame. What you are measuring is the passage of LOCAL time. There is no universal inertial frame of reference that can determine an 'absolute' second to correct for.
Answered by: Paul Walorski, B.A. Physics, Part-time Physics Instructor

Support US

Our server costs have gone up and our advertising revenue has gone down. You do the math! If you find our site useful, consider donating to keep us going. Thanks!

Science Quote

'Arrows of hate have been shot at me too, but they have never hit me, because somehow they belonged to another world with which I have no connection whatsoever.'

Albert Einstein

All rights reserved. © Copyright '1995-'2018   Privacy Statement | Cookie Policy