Why is there no color spectrum at the sub-atomic level? Or is there?
Asked by: Mark 'Socrates' Tusay
I presume that your question is 'Why don't we ever speak of sub-atomic particles as having
'color'?' To answer the question it is necessary to point out that light is, of course, made up of
photons -- each one having its own energy and hence its own frequency. The frequency range of the
electromagnetic spectrum that is visible to the human eye (and which we refer to as 'color') is a
very small region in the entire range of photon energies we have observed in nature.
That having been said, why do macroscopic objects have color? The sub-atomic particles which
constitute everyday objects (protons, neutrons, electrons) are bound together in atoms, molecules,
crystals etc. When light falls upon such an object, the energy of the photons may be enough to
excite oscillations in these bound structures: it may excite higher atomic energy levels, nuclear
energy levels, molecular rotations or vibrations, crystal vibrations, etc. These frequencies of
oscillations are (in principle) calculable given the techniques of quantum mechanics and solid
Once these particles have been excited, they immediately seek to return to the lower energy states
from which they came. This is accomplished by the emission of photons. These photons will tend to
have the energies of the oscillation frequencies I mentioned above. Naturally, a complicated object
will have many, many such possible oscillations frequencies and hence will emit light over a wide
range of frequencies. Some substances tend to emit preferably in certain regions of the
electromagnetic spectrum -- including frequencies we can see as 'color.' Organic substances are
particularly likely to do this (for example chlorophyll tends to emit in the green frequency range
-- that's why plants look green).
So now I can answer your question. At the sub-atomic level 'color' is not an intrinsic property of
anything. The same electron is just as capable of emitting X-rays, orange light, or radio waves --
all that matters is the environment and interactions it finds itself in contact with. Thus color is
rightfully a property of complex substances (molecules, crystals etc.), rather than of the
constituents that make them up.
Answered by: Brent Nelson, M.A. Physics, Ph.D. Student, UC Berkeley
The frequency (color) of light given off in a quantum system is
directly proportional to the energy difference between the quantum
states between which a transition is made. For example, when an electron
in an atom 'drops' from a higher allowed energy state to a lower allowed
energy state, light is given off with a frequency determined by:
E = h
where E is the difference in energy between the initial and final states,
h is Planck's constant, and is the frequency of the emitted light.
The reason there is no 'color spectrum' as such at the sub-atomic level is
that, within the nucleus, the difference between energy levels, delta E, is
substantially greater than the differences that typically occur between allowed
electron orbits around the nucleus. Therefore, when transitions occur within
the nucleus, there is a discrete spectrum of emitted frequencies, but the spectral
lines occur at much higher frequencies so that they do not fall within the visible, or color,
spectrum that we can see with our eyes.
Answered by: Warren Davis, Ph.D., President, Davis Associates, Inc., Newton, MA USA
'The strength and weakness of physicists is that we believe in what we can measure. And if we can't measure it, then we say it probably doesn't exist. And that closes us off to an enormous amount of phenomena that we may not be able to measure because they only happened once. For example, the Big Bang. ... That's one reason why they scoffed at higher dimensions for so many years. Now we realize that there's no alternative... '