Why isn't the electron considered a black hole? It does have mass and its radius is infinitely small, isn't it?
Asked by: Roland de Putter
In actuality, we don't know how big the electron is. All of our measurements point to the electron
having no size, but we haven't measured down far enough. The electron, if it were a black hole,
would have to be smaller than 1x10-57 meters, quite a bit smaller than we've ever measured!
But, another reason that the electron is not considered a black hole, even assuming that its radius
is infinitely small, is that it obeys the laws of quantum field theory. Normally, when one speaks
about black holes, one is talking about them in terms of Einstein's theory of general relativity.
No one is sure how nature merges Einstein's theory with quantum field theory. So we aren't really
sure if the idea of a black hole makes sense on distance scales as small as the (possible) radius
of the electron.. Our best idea to unify general relativity with quantum field theory is an idea
called string theory, but string theory still appears to be a long way from being put to any
Answered by: Andreas Birkedal-Hansen, M.A., Physics Grad Student, UC Berkeley
The electron (and all truly 'fundamental' particles) are considered to be true mathematical points
in the sense that they have no classical spatial extent. This is known, for example in the case of
the electron, by performing scattering experiments: the way particles scatter off one another is
quite different if the target is represented as a point as opposed to having some finite size. All
of the electron scattering experiments done so far are consistent with the hypothesis that the
electron is truly a 'point particle.'
According to general relativity all massive objects possess an event horizon known as the
Schwarzschild radius. This is a surface in three-dimensional space surrounding the object. Any
light rays emitted from within this radius are unable to escape. If an object exists
entirely within its Schwarzschild radius then it is referred to as a black hole. This radius
grows with the mass of the object according to the formula:
Notice that for our sun we obtain a radius of 2.95 kilometers. This is well within the interior of
the sun so it is not a black hole. For an electron we would obtain 1.35 x10-51 m. If the electron
were a point particle, it seems it would be within even this fantastically small radius and would
indeed be a black hole!
However, as a subatomic particle the electron is also a quantum-mechanical object. Recall the
wave-particle duality hypothesis of de Broglie. All objects have a wave function which represents
the probability of locating that object at a particular point in space. During a collision this
wave function momentarily collapses and the particle is truly at one 'point' in space, but it
immediately starts to spread out again after the instant of collision. The typical spread of the
wave-function of a point particle is given by the Compton wavelength:
and this can be considered the true quantum-mechanical 'size' of the object. Notice that this size
gets smaller as the mass gets larger. For you or I or the sun this quantum-mechanical size
is essentially zero (there's not much uncertainty as to where the sun is!) but for an electron the
size is 2.42 x10-12 m. Though still small, this is much, much larger than the Schwarzschild
radius. So quantum-mechanically most of the electron is 'outside' its event horizon. That's why it
and other subatomic particles are not black holes.
Answered by: Brent Nelson, M.A., Physics Ph.D. student, UC Berkeley
'In a way science is a key to the gates of heaven, and the same key opens the gates of hell, and we do not have any instructions as to which is which gate.
Shall we throw away the key and never have a way to enter the gates of heaven? Or shall we struggle with the problem of which is the best way to use the key?'